AnthonyB

These are all suitable (https://www.locksonline.co.uk/Fire-Rated-Mortice-Locks-For-Fire-Doors.html) as are digilocks. You can have certain holes in fire doors, otherwise you couldn't have letterboxes in fire doors (which you can). Rather odd they didn't comment on the other 7 unless llocated away from escape routes

If an existing operating premises and not a fit out in progress it's outside the jurisdiction of Building Control and is a matter controlled under the Fire Safety Order enforced by the Fire Service. Under this you, as the Responsible Person are required to determine your requirements by a Fire Risk Assessment, which as licensed premises should be written regardless of the number of employees. Fire Angel devices are for domestic premises only, although in certain circumstances may be mitigated in a Fire Risk Assessment if of the dual power supply type (mains and battery). The first requirement is for raising the alarm throughout the premises if someone discovers a fire - in really small premises this can be verbal (taking in to account background noise) if a shout could be clearly heard throughout the premises. If not then some form of enhanced warning is required - this would be an electrical fire alarm system to BS5839-1 Category M, comprising manual 'break glass' call points & alarm sounders linked via a control panel. You don't need automatic fire detection in most non sleeping premises unless the layout or risk requires it (or you choose to for property protection purposes which isn't a legal requirement) although in your case you my need some coverage - only a site visit as part of an FRA can determine this unless you have decent accurate floorplans.

Fire Warden training is a nice money maker for training companies, but there is nothing to stop the basic duties in an emergency being taught in house. With small numbers of staff a roll call may suffice as an alternative as it won't take too long (unlike normal situations where 10 minutes later names are still being checked off!)

Considering how many newsworthy fires in defective buildings, newsworthy critical defects uncovered and the general experience of the fire safety sector I wouldn't rely on an AI or BCO for fire safety advice - too much stuff gets signed off only later to be revealed to be substandard and need reworking at great expense.

https://www.thefpa.co.uk/training/courses_detail.fire-risk-assessment-3-days.html

That's just wrong, utterly wrong and a clear sign that the installation was not done by competent persons. Some fire alarm systems, due to the load on them and the required standby time, do need additional battery capacity outside that contained in the alarm panel, but there are purpose built Power Supply Units with internal charger for this purpose (e.g. https://www.safelincs.co.uk/24vdc-en54-4-approved-power-supply-units/). You can add photos as an attachment on this forum, it would be interesting to see what it looks like!

You don't have to be an electrician to do the 3 hour test, just competent and know what to do. Nothing in law says it has to be.

Damaging labels is why it's preferred to put the seals in the frame and not the door, solves your problem - fire door frames often have the channels pre-cut.

If the doors are onto an enclosed common escape route the simple answer is sadly no. The doors are allowed to have a gap of 3-4mm rather than being really tight up.

You don't have to be an electrician to do the 3 hour test, just competent and know what to do. Nothing in law says it has to be.

No, not if fitted properly - this is why a competent fire door contractor should be carrying out these works, I've seen thousands of pounds of wasted work on doors by well meaning joiners.

Roller shutter is easier as you've got the runners installed, check out your existing one, it may actually already be fire rated! Sounds a bit OTT though.

I have to say I think your landlord has lost touch with reality and is using H&S as an excuse for you to not do it. Easiest way for you to solve it is to get your local fire service's Community Safety Team to carry out one of their free home safety visit and mention it then - they will back you up in this.

If it comes from abroad via their warehouse and not direct to you then the loophole doesn't apply, it should comply....

A fire strategy is usually created at the design stage of a building - it demonstrates how the design will comply with the Building Regulations and is particularly important if the architect plans a building where a departure from the 'standard' guidance of Approved Document B is required to allow the design to be viable as it will detail the engineered solution used to meet Building Regulations functional requirements. It then accompanies the building through it's life so the various building owners/users are aware of what has been done in order to correctly maintain it and ensure any limits set are not exceeded. The strategy evolves with the building too, being updated as alterations and refurbishments occur. The Fire Risk Assessment is required for all existing premises other than inside private dwellings under specific fire legislation other than building regulations and is intended to reduce the risks to relevant persons on the premises (which is essentially anyone other than firefighters on site if the premises is on fire) by preventing fire through eliminating or controlling the presence of combustibles and ignition sources, mitigating the effects of fire by containing it via fire resisting structure and doors or extinguishing/controlling it with fixed or portable fire fighting systems and by ensuring persons can escape via fire detection & warning systems, sufficient escape routes with adequate protection and lighting and that there are suitable procedures, training and nominated persons to ensure the right thing is done. The risk assessment would refer to the fire strategy (if there is one) as part of the assessment process. Design fire strategies, unless straightforward, are usually beyond the skills of the architect and so Chartered Fire Engineers usually prepare them. Building Control or the Approved Inspector are the ones checking that the Building Regulations are broadly being met and would vet the strategy not write it.

Seems sensible, the landlord should have had more oversight on this in the first place so relevant fire safety works could have been costed in (or indeed the boiler not be allowed in the common parts and the tenant made to put it in their flat)

If they are drop-shipped direct from overseas they are able to sidestep the UK Furnishing Regs and also there is a greater chance of products being non conforming. Even where a seller states they are UK based, often your goods will clearly have arrived directly from China, not a UK warehouse. Sometimes there is a genuine UK seller using dropshipping, often they don't exist and the UK address is a "poste restant" or similar. If it's priced too good to be true it probably is and a large amount of eBay and Amazon new stock is counterfieit or poor quality and sometimes outright dangerous. If it's a genuine UK based seller and warehouse then there is more recourse against them under trading standards and consumer safety legislation.

With difficulty sometimes, you can find lots of video footage online of US Motorsport fires, some of the race types involve cars using a high alcohol content fuel and fires can be difficult to see - usually liberal amounts of dry powder are discharged all over the spill scene and vehicle with copious amounts of Cold Fire tipped over people and vehicles from buckets and converted water extinguishers just to make sure.

I can't go into much detail as I've not seen the place and I'm not doing your FRA. If you are saying is it possible, then yes, there is no reason why not. The existing layout and provisions for fire detection & warning, lighting, escape, etc will impact how much extra work is required - if the existing premises already had a high level of provision beyond the statutory minimum for the type you may find that you may not have as much physical additions as you might expect and that procedural and management matters are the main areas of concern.

There are no dispensations, fire won't behave differently just because of the virus. Your Fire Risk Assessment will determine the needs based on the relevant factors.

Yes, Article 17 of the Fire Safety Order requires a suitable system of maintenance. Suitable is as a default the benchmarks in the DCLG Guides and British Standards. A fire risk assessment would determine if a different service regime is possible - this isn't beyond possibility but must demonstrate why it still provides adequacy. All duty holders have been advised to review their FRA as a result of the current climate and this will determine where service intervals can be relaxed....and where they may need increasing!

Not explicitly - the legal requirement is to ensure the system is subject to a suitable system of maintenance and are maintained in an efficient state, in efficient working order and in good repair. However in deciding what is suitable reference would be made to both the Government's official fire risk assessment guides and the relevant British Standards, both of which require weekly testing. It is possible to have alternative regimes but the onus is on you to show why they would still be as suitable as the default of weekly tests.

You can price up the materials on Safelincs website: https://www.safelincs.co.uk/radio-interlinked-smoke-alarms/ , it's then labour for fixing on top. With Grade D wireless kit each detector still needs a local mains supply (often the lighting circuit) , just no cable to link them all. If you want 99% wirefree then you need a Grade C system like Illumino Ignis's Premsafe or one of the many commercial standard Grade A systems out there (Hyfire, EDA, EMS, etc)

That's bizarre, never seen or heard of that before. Shouldn't make any difference.

The minimum service visits is 2 per year - on visits the minimum testing requirement is at least one call point or detector per zone or loop. However in a 12 month period all call points and detectors should have been tested at least once. For convenience sites on 2 visits a year each one tests 50% of devices and on 4 visits each one tests 25% but there is no requirement to do it this way - in theory on a 4 zone conventional system with 10 devices per zone and two service visits a year you could test 4 (1 per zone) on one visit and the other 36 on the second visit. . .