AnthonyB

There hasn't been and still isn't a requirement for emergency lighting in hotel bedrooms, it's bizarre that places have it fitted!

Needs a decent Fire Risk Assessment as this set up doesn't satisfy the needs for either a stay put block of flats or a simultaneous evacuation block of flats, so the first thing needed is a determination as to which it should be. If simultaneous evacuation the common system should have heats and sounders in the flat's internal hallways not just the common areas If stay put there should be no common system at all unless there is an automatic smoke control system in which case there should be detection but no sounders or call points.

https://croner.co.uk/resources/managing-health-safety/what-should-employers-consider-for-e-bikes-in-the-workplace/ https://www.london-fire.gov.uk/safety/the-workplace/e-bike-and-e-scooters-guidance-for-responsible-persons/

Plenty of suitable products available - use this step by step selector to determine what will d0 - https://www.hilti.co.uk/content/hilti/E1/GB/en/business/business/engineering/fire-protection/firestop-selector.html Or get a competent passive fire protection contractor to deal with it.

You would need a concealed closer as I can see how a traditional overhead closer would struggle. https://www.safelincs.co.uk/concealed-door-closers/

You would need to fire stop the pipes and cables (not with aerosol fire foam) to prevent hidden spread of smoke and fire, doors are of little use if the fire can pass them by. Toilets don't usually need fire doors unless they contain a particular risk - you could either upgrade the cupboard door or the toilet door but no need to do both.

They will have to take individual responsibility as you can't expect workers from another part of the site to enter a building that may be the source of the fire, they have a legal obligation to cooperate with measures provided for their health & safety. As long as you have a suitable lone worker system (these days signing in on apps has supplemented paper sign in books and in/out boards) then they have to play their part.

You would have to present the information in a way that is tailored to their vulnerabilities/disabilities, simplified as required. If they were not deemed as having suitable capacity under MCA 2005 then I suppose you would only have to inform those with legal responsibility/guardianship. Until some better guidance comes out this is the best I can think of!

No. Grade F (battery only) devices would not be suitable as part of a communal fire alarm system, they are only really acceptable for single dwellings that predate the Building Regs requirement for mains alarms. The system should be a commercial grade system (depending on which Government guide you use either a BS5839-6 Grade A or BS5839-1 system, however from an equipment point of view they are identical, just some design differences) There is scope in the outgoing LACORS guide for a communal grade D system (domestic mains powered) but this is usually only for ground and first floor buildings. None of these requirements are new, they have simply been ignored until Grenfell brought block fire safety to the forefront.

Google lens is stumped too - nearest example it could find was an air vent cover!

It is a bit slow on there sadly. Building Regs in England, Wales, Scotland or NI? It isn't a defined Key Term in ADB, but the Oxford Dictionary suggests "ancillary (to something) providing necessary support to the main work or activities of an organization" A kitchen could be seen as ancillary to the running of a restaurant, nor is it defined as one of the places of special fire hazard in the same document. You see plenty of restaurants with the kitchen partly or fully open to the seating area and others fully enclosed or with fire shutters, seemingly according to the whim of the Authority Having Jurisdiction for where the premises is built/fitted out.

Building Regulations do indeed still have the statutory bar. Fire Safety Regulations don't as it was removed with the repeal of the Fire Precautions Act which used to take the same approach with fire certificates (which led to some rather outdated precautions remaining in place well past their inadequacy was fatally proved). This means that whilst there is no automatic requirement to upgrade something (unless explicit in a regulation under the Order) it can't be automatically accepted either just because it was OK 20+ years ago - this is where the risk assessment process comes in. External walls, including balconies and windows etc are explicitly required to be assessed for fire risk in all premises with 2 or more dwellings - however this risk assessment is likely to find most low rise blocks low risk partly because the building standards for these hasn't required high standards of fire performance and still doesn't so it would be wrong to require a higher standard than even a new build requires!

It has to be considered no matter what the height - the law is clear on this. However the likelihood of being other than low risk is small, the height being one of the factors to consider when assessing the risk.

Flats from 1961 were built to Building Regulations that were based around stay put. Conversions are usually expected to conform to modern Building Regulations i.e. from 1/1/1992 - but the date of conversion is not a hard rule as there are post 1992 conversions requiring simultaneous evacuation and pre 1992 ones that can actually operate stay put. A good assessor won't be blinded by the date, it's a pointer and no more.

This guide may help determine if the design and installation is OK. https://www.logic4training.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Hydrocarbon-Refrigerants-Guidelines-1.pdf Note that: Systems, or part of a system should not be located within a space or room where its volume is such that an entire refrigerant leak would cause a refrigerant/air mixture of a concentration higher than one-fifth of the Lower Flammability Limit (LFL) of the refrigerant (equation 2.2). If this is not possible and the installation is in a machinery room then the use of a refrigerant leak detector and mechanical ventilation should be employed.

In premises of more than one storey, an electrical fire alarm system should be installed. These systems should have ‘break glass’ call points and fire alarm sounders, connected to a control panel. (Not domestic smokes!) In premises of more than one storey, where a fire might start and be undetected in its early stages, the fire alarm system might need to incorporate automatic fire detectors. These will generally be smoke detectors or, in the case of kitchens or other rooms in which smoke detectors would cause false alarms, heat detectors). As per https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/making-your-small-non-domestic-premises-safe-from-fire This guide has Article 50 status meaning following it will ensure you are deemed compliant, not following it tends to demonstrate non compliance with the legislation.

No water mist extinguisher can carry an official Class B rating as they can't meet the minimum performance requirements stated in the manufacturing standard EN3. They aren't unsafe but just poor performing - a 2L can obtain an 8B rating, 6 litre 21B, but the minimum they should achieve is 34B & 114B respectively. Likewise they can't claim official effectiveness against Class C fires as this is reserved for Powder extinguishers. They still represent a very good choice for the home as they cover all the main domestic fire risks - ordinary combustibles, electrical equipment and cooking oils

There are no internal areas requiring an FRA - are there external stairs and decks? If not then the only possible area that may require addressing is the external wall construction.

P66 8.11 points out they don't need to be compartment floors, but Table B4 does give a 30 minute fire resistance requirement even when not a compartment floor. Of course the age of the building will have an impact on what was required at the time it was built.

If not fire resisting external doors for the purpose of protecting an adjacent external escape stair or similar there isn't.

PAS 9980 gives some useful advice, on the face of it this sounds lower risk unless there's some massive hidden cavity behind the wall! If in doubt get an external wall specialists opinion.

It does seem a little excessive! The only possible reason I can think of is that if you didn't have the key you would be trapped too close to the house.

Government Fire Risk Assessment guidance for educational premises, which has ACOP like special status under Article 50 of the Fire Safety Order as all the guides now do, absolutely requires exit signage in anything other than the smallest simplest premises. Age of Build doesn't help as most signage that would be required for Fire Safety Order compliance is outside the scope of Building Regs so would have been picked up during the Building Control process (which itself is recognised as actually not much use at ensuring even the things that are covered by Building Regulations are correct!) although as emergency lighting would come under the BR process I'm surprised there weren't at least a few internally illuminated exit signs at final exits and rooms used as places of assembly. Who did the FRA?

No. Intumescent strips only are a common request by Licensing Officers for HMO's when the common system is only on the stair landings and hallways to prevent a delay in the alarm sounding (it's an old fashioned approach, but remains until their HMO guidance is updated). As you have detection in the bedrooms then, in accordance with all other guidance for protection of escape routes as well as the HMO guide, smoke seals would be expected.

If you actually read the linked guidance, which has article 50 status, it says: The fire safety principles and recommendations in this Guide can also be applied to smaller types of outdoor accommodation which fall under the same duties such as holiday caravans, camping and glamping pods, bothies, lodges, shepherds’ huts, tents, tree houses and yurts. I agree fire doors is taking it a bit far though!