AnthonyB

How many floors? The appropriate guidance is here http://www.cieh.org/library/Knowledge/Housing/National_fire_safety_guidance_08.pdf

The fire risk assessment you have to carry out (you are responsible for legal compliance of the office whilst leasing it and employing people there, not your landlord) would not only address fire risks and required precautions in your office but also the effect of a fire in your office on the flats above. From your description it sounds like this has been looked at in the past and the fire separation deemed inadequate hence why the fire alarm in your unit is also covering the flats. In theory as the system controls and power are in your demise they are under your control for maintenance - this is the default fire safety law position - however this can be overruled by contract law - if your lease includes a service charge and that the fire alarm system in common is a service charge item then the landlord should be maintaining it. There is a legal requirement for cooperation between different Responsible Persons (which can include the landlord where they retain control over an aspect of the building) so your landlord may be breaking the law. If you have fire safety concerns then you should contact the fire service Business Fire Safety Team. If you have landlord/tenant/lease related issues you should contact an appropriate lawyer.

In a block that small 30 minutes fire resistance is usually acceptable which it sounds like it has (notional 30 minutes can be achieved by lath & plaster under timber so asbestos under timber would be better). A small shared lobby wouldn't need to have smoke control and the only requirement would be that the flat front doors were fire doors to the standard applicable at the time of conversion. Stay put would usually be acceptable, no common alarms needed. If there is a stair and landings in common it may be needed to apply the guidance used in your FRA but that only applies where the conversion doesn't give the same standard as a post 1991 build - it's possible in the smallest blocks that were converted before 1991 to still meet the standards that were introduced then. If a common alarm is required then yes it must be mains powered. Residential risk assessment is highly specialised with each case determined on it's merits and whilst there are general trends based on a properties age they aren't hard and fast.

It's nothing to do with Building Regulations which wouldn't apply to an existing building not undergoing alterations - it's a fire safety legislation issue A proper Fire Risk Assessment will determine to what standard the doors need to be - depending on the size and layout of the block older standard fire doors are fully acceptable if still in working condition. The amended Fire Safety Order includes flat front doors, windows and external structure as the responsibility of the freeholder or RMC to assess and ensure are adequate for the risk. Doors that aren't to the appropriate standard must be remediated, usually at the cost of the flat in questions owner and the freeholder/TMC is expected to ensure this is done with an expectation for them to resort to civil legal action or enforcement action via the local authority if needed.

Are they, presumably being new boards, in a non combustible housing, i.e. all metal? They certainly aren't a defined area of special fire hazard.

No, it's not retrospective - as long as it is in safe, efficient working order you are fine.

It's your house, you can do as you wish, you aren't required to.

If the tamper seal on the safety pin is intact then you should be OK. Of course as you should be having these serviced annually the service engineer would have checked this for you. If you are really worried get it serviced again early or weigh it. If it's more than 10 years old it needs other corrective action anyway.

As the Council are the enforcement body then if they are happy with good fitting solid doors to bedrooms and only a fire door to the kitchen then that's all you need to do - this sounds like a Housing Act HHSRS issue so different guidance applies compared to if you were carrying out work under Building Regulations

It's all in BS7273-4 and yes the link should be local to each door.

Live plants? With two escapes and a managed use policy then in theory - however they would need regular watering and care as if they die of and dry out they would be a hazard and would likely fall below the required fire performance for a circulation area of Class 0/Euro Class B-s3,d2 if treated as a wall lining.

The risk assessor is correct and reflects the Government guidance that sets out requirements in small premises - domestic smoke alarms are for homes not places of work: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/making-your-small-non-domestic-premises-safe-from-fire Means of giving warning in the event of a fire In single storey premises with open plan layouts and small numbers of people, the alarm could be raised by shouting ‘fire’. Alternatively, the alarm could be raised manually, using a hand-operated bell or siren. In premises of more than one storey, where the above method of giving warning would be unreliable, an electrical fire alarm system should be installed. These systems should have ‘break glass’ call points and fire alarm sounders, connected to a control panel. In premises of more than one storey, where a fire might start and be undetected in its early stages, the fire alarm system might need to incorporate automatic fire detectors. These will generally be smoke detectors or, in the case of kitchens or other rooms in which smoke detectors would cause false alarms, heat detectors).

https://envirograf.com/product-category/electrical-and-plumbing/

Who is the freeholder? Is it a third party or is it yourself and the other owner jointly? Whoever it is holds responsibility in law for the common internal and external areas and is required to complete a Fire Risk Assessment under the Fire Safety Order which would determine if a linked alarm is required - potentially with sufficient fire resistance between the properties you might not require one and a small ground floor only lobby doesn't need smoke control. I was involved in a FTT case in a similar set up where excessive measures were installed and they were expected to pay towards them so took it to tribunal and with my help won so I am familiar with the scenario

Building regs kicks in with a higher category for dwellings three or more stories only where the dwellinghouse is 'large' with at least one floor being over 200sq.m. in which case it jumps to LD2 as well as a Grade A system. It does open the door to higher categories if there is a consideration of a special risk, referring then to BS5839-6 which would indicate LD2 - but they persist in only prescribing LD3 other than for large dwellings, using sprinklers instead for dwellings that reach 4+ stories

The legislation affecting flats in England do not apply in Scotland, which has it's own legislation that exempts dwellings including any common areas from needing a FRA - the only duty is to maintain any fire service facilities (e.g. dry risers, etc)

LD3 (hallways/landings) is still the minimum in England

Most people don't know about this and even less enforce it. Up and down the country mags are still being installed with no regard to EN 13637 Electronically Controlled Escape Systems (for use on escape routes). Unless official guidance is updated & new standards insisted on by AHJ's it will be a while before any noticeable change

Commercial tenant will be responsible for the FRA of that unit. Residential units are private dwellings so wouldn't need internal FRAs Building has 2 or more dwellings so would in theory need an FRA covering the external fabric of the building

If you are in England you can have what you want if it's your own private dwelling. If your budget stretches to it the optimum cover is LD1 which is virtually everywhere (as you have described). LD2 (hallways/landings, kitchen & principle habitable room) is a good in-between and is quite commonly installed in new builds even where not legally obligated to.

Are these flats or commercial? If this is an external stair the following usually applies: Where an external stairway is provided, any door or window (other than toilet windows) opening onto the stairway, or within 1.8 metres horizontally or 9 metres vertically of it, should be fire-resisting. Windows should be unopenable and doors should be self-closing. In exceptional circumstances, a small number of unprotected, openable windows may be allowed, provided that the rooms containing them are separated from the rest of the building by fire-resisting construction and the external stairway is not the only one from the upper storeys.

You'd find most guidance here https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fire-safety-in-purpose-built-blocks-of-flats

If the original panel was asbestos this will have been the original fire rated enclosure - a 1960's block would indeed have compartmentation (see CP3 Chapter IV Part 1) and if this has been altered worse then original it needs remediation - however if it is now stopped at each floor you could potentially argue that this has been used as an alternative approach to remediation that provides the same level of protection. This should be determined as part of fire risk assessment, retrospective fire strategy and the safety case.

Fixed shut usually means incapable of opening. What reason was given for changing them - where are they?

The inspection you've copied does give repair options so as long as the FRA considers a repaired door acceptable for the risk you are fine - are these certified or notional doorsets? If certified then it may be necessary to contact the manufacturer to check that the repairs required can be completed without affecting certification as you shouldn't be making the situation worse/to a lower standard than the original installation.