AnthonyB

Whoever carries it out must be competent and a registered risk assessor is the best route to this. If its a very small block meeting the following description the government does provide self assessment guidance: General needs blocks of flats that: • were constructed as a purpose-built block of flats; or • were converted into a block of flats in accordance with the 1991, or later, versions of the Building Regulations; and • were, in either case, designed on the basis of a ‘stay put’ strategy, whereby, in the event of a fire in one flat, occupants of other flats are normally safe to remain within their own flats The scope of this Guide is further limited to three storey blocks, comprising not more than a ground, first and second floor and containing no more than six flats typically arranged such that there are two flats per floor. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/making-your-small-block-of-flats-safe-from-fire

A picture would be more use - could be for noise, sounds unlikely part of the fire protection - perhaps it was added after installation as the door slam was found to be too loud.

No - your block is too big to follow the small building relaxations. It was equipped correctly just not completed so should be restored to the standard that applied at the time of build which was an AOV (& was in previous editions of the guidance as well)

Re read it and look at the height of the block in question. The diagram I have posted is for hallway equipped flats in blocks that do not meet the small blocks relaxation

The question has been flipped the wrong way around - on open deck approach flats with a single escape route it would only be windows with a bottom sill under 1.1m that should be FR - above that it's not an issue (assuming they don't face an external stair)

Only if the floors are slab as well or otherwise fully protected. Sub division is preferred as fire rated ceilings have limitations, but on small blocks a risk assessor may be pragmatic

The intrinsic features of the signboard in the guidance to the Health and Safety (Safety Signs and Signals) Regulations 1996 states it should be white, but the text to the actual regulation allows for the colorimetric features be such that they can be easily seen and understood thus allowing a bit of leeway - for example photoluminescent signage doesn't have white backgrounds, more a pale yellow green. So common sense can be applied - a pedantic approach would be to say they aren't compliant, but a risk based approach is far more pragmatic and is why no enforcement agency has ever had an issue with these. If you wanted to be really strict they don't comply in white either without a pictogram!

Well hopefully the FRA training or ongoing CPD/additional training should have touched on this, but the government small flat block guide gives some handy non sales generating tips to looking at fire doors, with the larger blocks guide stating where and when different ages and types of doors can be accepted. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/making-your-small-block-of-flats-safe-from-fire https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fire-safety-in-purpose-built-blocks-of-flats

It it one of the few schools that isn't fully externally fenced these days? No real issue otherwise to justify it. The legislation & guidance is here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fire-safety-risk-assessment-educational-premises

Armed with the certification & technical support from Envirograf if they still won't commit you could take the case to technical determination for which you have a fair chance of winning (the technical data and certification plus the prospect of a determination may make them turn around and accept it by itself!)

Could have been just poor FRAs in the past, too many in the resi FRA sector that don't know what they are doing. Latent defects from date of build generally require remediation as the building thus never complied even with the standards at the time of build. It's always been required in modern Building Regs history (post 1991) for a flat block of that height/floors to have the lobby adjacent to the stair ventilated. Unfortunately from experience the vast majority of residential buildings from the last 25 years have some form of fire safety defect dating back to build and it's only since Grenfell that it's started being taken seriously.

Yes

Remember the FIA support the trade primarily...It should be no greater than 6 months but in the real world a bit of leeway is acceptable, if you have the visit booked within the month due you are unlikely to face enforcement action (but insurers may be more strict). A 9 month gap is another matter and it sounds like your contractor is taking on more work than they have the resources to service and you may need to look around for another provider.

You need to talk to Envirograf who have a variety of tested solutions. https://envirograf.com/product/mouldblok-fire-resistant-coating/ https://envirograf.com/product/benefits-of-intumescent-paint-for-wood/

It's a legal requirement for them to share relevant details under s156 of the Building Safety Act Provision of information to residents The amendments made to the Fire Safety Order should make people feel safer in their homes and ensure that residents understand what you are doing to comply with your responsibilities. We have already mandated specific instructions that you must provide to your residents under the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022, but these new requirements go further to enhance the provision of information and help residents feel informed and involved. It is also important that you record your name and a UK address in the fire risk assessment to make it easier for enforcement authorities to identify you and, where necessary, take enforcement action. You must provide residents with the following information: any risks to residents identified in the fire risk assessment the fire safety measures provided for the safety of any or all occupants (such as the means of escape, the measures to restrict the spread of fire and what people should do in the event of a fire) the name and UK address of the Responsible Person the identity of any person appointed to assist with making or reviewing the fire risk assessment the identity of any competent person nominated by the Responsible Person to implement firefighting measures any risks to relevant persons throughout the building that have been identified by other Responsible Persons in the building You should consider providing contact details, if different to your contact details as the Responsible Person, for residents to be able to inform you of any concerns or queries they have about fire safety matters, or the information provided to them. Government may, by regulation, update the list of information to be provided to residents to reflect future developments in fire safety and specify the frequency and format in which the information should be provided. The Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 already mandate fire safety instructions that must be shared with residents of multi-occupied domestic premises where resident evacuation would be through common parts, such as the evacuation strategy, how to report a fire and what they must do when a fire occurs. In addition, the Regulations require Responsible Persons to provide information on fire doors including that they should be kept shut when not in use, that residents should not tamper with self-closing devices and that residents should report any faults with doors immediately. The Regulations stipulate that information on fire safety instructions should be displayed in a conspicuous part of the building with a copy provided to new residents when they move in and existing residents on an annual basis. If you are the Responsible Person for a building located in England, you should provide both the instructions required under the Regulations and the information required as a result of the changes to the Fire Safety Order. Under the Building Safety Act 2022, Accountable Persons also have responsibilities to share information with residents. It may be helpful to cooperate with Accountable Persons to provide all sets of information as a single package so that all necessary information is in one place and format for residents. You can find the requirements contained within the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 here.

Possibly, especially if they are a workplace used by care staff on the premises. Other legislation can apply covering fire safety and most responsible providers carry out some form of FRA including person centered FRAs See here for detailed guidance https://www.nifrs.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/NFCC-Specialised-Housing-Guidance.pdf

See above answer - the building includes two or more dwellings with an external wall in common so yes it does.

A fire risk assessment must be reviewed by the responsible person regularly so as to keep it up to date - the interval is not set in legislation but usually expected to be annually - a full new assessment isn't required unless there is reason to think the existing one is invalid or there has been a significant change in the matters to which it relates including when the premises, special, technical and organisational measures, or organisation of the work undergo significant changes, extensions, or conversions. Some Responsible Persons will have their external competent provider re-assess annually, others will review themselves in house and only reassess if there are changes or 3-5 years have passed. Both can be seen to be valid approaches & I have clients that work in both of the above - some bring me in annually, others every 2-3 years.

Dust Box?????

We'll need a bit more info than that if we are to help!

The law says the FRA must cover the external walls. An EWS1 is nothing to do with fire safety legislation and is a tool for lenders. Where a site is low rise and low risk the FRA can address it without the need for an (expensive) PAS9980 External Walls Fire Risk Appraisal - mine do as do other providers I've worked for or provide verification for. Sadly there are too many in the FRA sector that don't really know the ins and outs of residential fire risk assessment - so many either require completely unnecessary work or dangerously miss out key areas. For the pictured block roof void access would also be needed if possible to check the fire walls in the void - too many assessors miss this even though the government guidance considers it a standard part of all residential FRAs

Will the cables remain mechanically fixed to the wall or ceiling by metal fixings after the PVC trunking has melted and failed? If so, then yes. If the cable is only clipped to the trunking and will sag & fall with it then no.

If they don't have a way leave to access the land then it can be obstructed - it's a civil matter and you should take legal advice from a property law specialist.

That's one for your Fire Risk Assessor to deal with. The FRA would look at occupancy numbers, layout, travel distances, other fire precautions etc and determine if the building can comply & remain safe without it. I've assessed various buildings with this situation and some have been able to do without the stair but others have had to replace it. Many standards are not retrospective and age alone doesn't mean it's unsuitable, why exactly have you been told to replace it - most often it's due to lack of maintenance and becoming structurally unsound being the reason to replace - again your fire risk assessment should take a pragmatic approach as to whether an older style stair is suitable.

No - as it is a building containing two or more dwellings it is subject to the Fire Safety Order & whilst there are no internal common areas the Fire Safety Act 2021 clarifies that the FSO applies to the structure, external walls (including balconies, doors and windows) & flat entrance doors. The FRA would only cover the outside of the building and based on the photos would most likely conclude the risk is low, but would still be required.