Jonny Roberts Posted February 19, 2020 Report Share Posted February 19, 2020 Hi, Can anyone explain the reasoning why cold smoke seals are not required on openings in protected shafts forming a service shaft (i.e. riser cupboard doors) according to Approved Document B of the Building Regulations? Thanks Jonathan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sutton Posted February 20, 2020 Report Share Posted February 20, 2020 The purpose of cold smoke seals is to prevent cold smoke percolating from a risk room to an escape route and smoke logging it, making it untenable. A lift or service shaft is not an escape route, however if the lift is used for means of escape then it would require rethinking if such a thing was considered. Why such shafts are protected is to prevent fire spreading from one floor to another in the later stages of a fire, smoke would not be a problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny Roberts Posted February 20, 2020 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2020 Hi Tom, Thanks for your reply. Can a service shaft not be considered a 'risk room'? Also, do electrical cupboards/enclosures (for example the type found within a communal hallway of a property converted into flats) require smoke seals on the doors? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sutton Posted February 21, 2020 Report Share Posted February 21, 2020 I wouldn't, I would be more concerned with fire spread later in the development f the fire. I think meter cupboards would need to be risk assessed and may need cold smoke seals. I have been to a number of incidents involving electric meter cupboards so I do see a risk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.