Jump to content

Alarm Verifying - Fire evacuation

Recommended Posts

Hello team,

I'm new to this forum and would be grateful for some advise or to be pointed in the right direction.  I work in an academy (Secondary school) with 900 students on roll.  Due to the number of false alarms of late the following question has been asked.  Is it acceptable to silence the alarm and carry out alarm verification/verifying before signalling a full evacuation?  I understand it is acceptable for trained persons to investigate the presence of a true fire; but should a evacuation take place first or could some kind of 'Stay put' policy be put in place?

Thank you in advance for any help you can give.

Kind regards,


Link to post
Share on other sites

A stay put policy would not be acceptable for a school but a two stage fire alarm could be.

The first stage is a warning to staff, to prepare for evacution and after a prescribe time, the full evacuation is triggered. During the first stage, a search would take place, to establish if it is a false alarm, if it is, then the full evacuation can be cancelled, if not then a full evacution triggered.

The first stage warning can be a coded word over the tannoy or a special record played or a coded set of lights which can be seen by everybody the solutions are many.

This delay has to be electronically controlled by the fire alarm equipment and would be no more than 3 to 5 minutes, the cancellation would be manual.

You must also consult with the local fire and rescue service to check it is acceptable to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Staged alarms have been used in some schools for some time, the investigative stage in my school was a continuous bell with an intermittent bell for evacuate (the opposite of what it should be in standards, but this was a very old system!)

You could have a staff alarm using the methods as Tom suggests, other places will have a staff alarm at the panel (if situated near a suitably constantly staffed reception) others use intermittent sounders.

Silencing the alarm to investigate would not be acceptable and there have been prosecutions in serious fires where this has been done. In conventional (non addressable) systems (& depending on the programming settings even with some addressable systems) if you silence a zone you have no redundancy as the call points and detectors on that zone will not cause the system to re-alarm if there is a fire that spreads (or someone sees it and breaks another call point) and you are purely reliant on the investigation team going back to the main panel (or communicating if you use radios). You would need to get a staged alarm programmed in the panel and the FRA and Fire Procedure amended in consultation with the appropriate authorities.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...