Jump to content

Tom Sutton

Power Member
  • Posts

    3,641
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tom Sutton

  1. To my knowledge upholstered furniture is the only furniture subject to fire regulation I cannot imagine trying to ignite a substantial piece of hardwood with a small ignition source like a cigarette end or match. Therefore if you import upholstered items you will need to conform to the Furniture and Furnishings (Fire Safety) Regulations 1988 (as amended in 1989 and 1993).

    For more information go to http://www.fira.co.uk/ and http://www.firesafe.org.uk/furniture-and-furnishings-fire-safety-regulations-19881989-and-1993/

  2. There is no is no set requirement for the number of competent persons (fire wardens) The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 says the responsible person must appoint one or more competent persons to assist him in undertaking the preventive and protective measures. If you consider your self competent using the equipment, the definition of competent is in the order, then that's fine and you could train everybody else who should receive regular training on the use of the equipment and the evacuation plan. Has the RP carried out a fire risk assessment?

    Go to http://www.firesafe.org.uk/ for more information.

  3. You are subject to The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 which requires you to conduct a fire risk assessment and the guidance can be found in the DCLG document Offices and shops. There is guidance in http://www.firesafe.org.uk/fire-risk-assessment/ for small premises and all matters regarding fire safety which can be found in http://www.firesafe.org.uk/ including what I need in place, in the ways of fire equipment and action plan.

  4. I would like some advise, please. I work in a care home and would like to know where I can get information on whom to contact when someone has a question about fire prevention. We are not too sure where we stand about fire prevention.

    To add to what Harry has said, the person responsible for the implementation of The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 is the person designated the Responsible Person and can be the employer, owner or the person who has control of the premises and the local Fire and Rescue Service is the enforcing authority. The DCLG provides guides for the RP and in your case the main guide would be the Residential care premises which helps the RP to for fill his/her duties. Check out http://www.firesafe....ety-order-2005/ for more information.

  5. The above posting is not what I sent it must have been corrupted it should have read;

    The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 requires the Responsible Person to conduct a Fire Risk Assessment and part of that FRA is, " in the event of danger, it must be possible for persons to evacuate the premises as quickly and as safely as possible." (Article 14b) Also Article 18 requires the RP to appoint competent persons to assist. (Fire marshals) The RP can get advice from the appropriate DCLG guidance document, under emergency plans, checkout http://www.firesafe....ety-order-2005/ It is the RP who decides what that policy will be and only the enforcing authority (fire and rescue service) can challenge the policy. I would be interested to know, at the last evacuation drill was there any short coming found.

  6. The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 requires the Responsible Person to conduct a Fire Risk Assessment and part of that FRA is

    in the event of danger, it must be possible for persons to evacuate the premises as quickly and as safely as possible. (Article 14b) Also Article 18 requires the RP to appoint competent persons to assist. (fire marshals) The RP can get advice from the appropriate DCLG guidance document under emergency plans, checkout http://www.firesafe.org.uk/regulatory-reform-fire-safety-order-2005/ It is the RP who decides what that policy will be and only the enforcing authority (fire and rescue service) can challenge the policy. I would be interested to know, at the last evacuation drill was any short coming found.

  7. Fire door leaves are generally not required to provide a specific surface spread-of-flame barrier, and may therefore be decorated as desired.

    There is no evidence to suggest that over painting of intumescent seals has any detrimental effect on the ability of the seals to perform efficiently. There are some benefits in over painting the seals as they are less likely to absorb atmospheric moisture. However, there are limits on how much paint can be applied without there being a risk of the seal being rendered inoperative. It is recommended that over painting be limited to a maximum of five coats of conventional oil-bound paint or varnish. When preparing a frame for redecorating, the use of heat or chemical strippers should be avoided if intumescent seals are incorporated. If seals are damaged by either of these processes, they should be replaced. If glazing beads have been painted with intumescent paint, it is essential that they be repainted with a similar paint.

  8. It all depends on the risk assessment some buildings may require emergency lighting others not. When a fire risk assessment is conducted in the common areas of blocks of flats the need for emergency lighting will be identified in the documentation, assuming you are not conducting the FRA yourself. Check out the DCLG Sleeping Accommodation guide, Section 5 for more information. A link to the guide can be found in http://www.firesafe.org.uk/regulatory-reform-fire-safety-order-2005/ plus other relevant information.

  9. Short of us replacing the door, would the installation of additional pre-warning systems be sufficient in adhering to regulations?

    The thinking behind this is if additional systems were installed triggering alarms sooner in the event of a potential fire, the building will be cleared quicker meaning no potential risk to those attempting to escape past the entrance.

    In principle The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 is all about fire risk assessment and the above is just that. However the DCLG guidance on offices and shops ( download from this link http://www.firesafe....ety-order-2005/ ) provides the benchmark and requires all escape staircases to be full protected. If you could provide a safe alternative to this then it may be acceptable.

    Principles are one thing consider the practical issues,

    1. How would you achieve this pre-alarm and give sufficient time for the building to be evacuated before the fire affected the staircase.

    2. You must consider how long it would take to evacuate the building.

    3. Have you considered the radiation risk from this door to people attempting to pass this door.

    4. The costs between a new FDs 30 door and the additional systems you propose.

    Personally I think a new FDs 30 would be the best option.

×
×
  • Create New...