April 20, 20179 yr comment_10087 I have in the past recommended lifts in mid rise block of student accommodation with a L2 alarm system to be interfaced with the alarm so it returns to the ground floor on fire alarm activativation. It there anywhere in the guidance documents or regs back up this or it is just best practice I have picked up from somewhere? Report
April 20, 20179 yr comment_10090 Lift control fire alarm interfaces are required in the BS EN for lifts, but it's never been a specific requirement in most fire safety guidance, just a very useful extra. Report
April 21, 20179 yr comment_10092 Fire fighting lifts must conform to EN 81, which included the lift car must return to Fire Service Access Level and park with doors open. I guess it has come from that and as AB as said "a very useful extra" for standard lifts. Report
April 23, 20179 yr comment_10098 Thank you both. What would you say to a lift contractor that says interfacing the lift with the alarm for it to be grounded is a just a recommendation not a requirement. My thoughts were student building, 3 storey, upto 40 students ==> therefore grounding would be very useful. Report
April 26, 20179 yr comment_10107 It's a requirement if your fire risk assessment deems it necessary..... Report
August 13, 20187 yr comment_12461 BS 999:2008 10.4.2.1 Control systems and control rooms The sophistication of the fire alarm system and public address arrangements should be taken into account when establishing which evacuation procedures might be possible in large or complex buildings. Control systems should be designed such that: • all sound systems which do not perform safety functions, including temporary ones, are silenced in the event of fire; • passenger lifts are brought immediately to the designated exit level, and kept there during the fire emergency (see Annex G for evacuation lifts and 21.3.4 for fire-fighting lifts); • urgent information is clearly Report
August 14, 20187 yr comment_12471 That's for new builds or refurbs and where Approved Document B is not being used. BS9999 is NOT a risk assessment guide, is NOT a legal requirement and is NOT retrospective. The law is quite clear that all provisions are risk based. Far too many practitioners spend other peoples money by getting RP's to put stuff in that is not legally required as it's easier than actually assessing the risk and giving RP's an informed choice. Would it be nice if every lift was upgraded to include fire alarm interfacing? Yes Does it actually need to be done? No, not across the board for existing buildings. When was the last time in the UK when there was a fatality or even a near miss from someone using a lift in a fire? Never seen it done in 20 years of evacuation drills either, except where managed use of the lift was part of an evacuation plan. Report
May 4, 20224 yr comment_25594 Slightly connected to this topic.... If you have a double-knock system on a fire alarm, should the lifts 'ground' at the first-knock, stopping them being used to investigate the alarm, or at the second knock? Grateful for any comments / thoughts? Report
June 6, 20223 yr comment_26574 Entirely down to the premises and it's risk assessment. It's possible to justify leaving them active during the investigation phase, especially as in all but the smallest buildings you won't have time to investigate before any delay trips over to stage 2 if you don't have a lift. Report
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.