Ian Watts Posted April 29, 2021 Report Share Posted April 29, 2021 (edited) As a member if BS 5266 I find it hard to explain why strict compliance to BS 5266 would not be appropriate. In this context my thought is that while remote illuminance of stickers is acceptable the actual verification of mains healthy at 100 lux on the sign and 5 lux in an emergency is hard to be confident with when most retail emergency lighting sources are not actually 3rd party approved / performance verified. Edited April 29, 2021 by Ian Watts Context error Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Sutton Posted May 3, 2021 Report Share Posted May 3, 2021 Ian are you answering a question if so what is the question or making a rhetorical statement that most retail emergency lighting sources are not actually 3rd party approved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.