Jump to content

Mike North

Power Member
  • Posts

    296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Mike North's Achievements

  1. Probably not, but try bat wings they are far more robust
  2. Because the accommodation is not a dwelling and comes under Residential (other) 2(b) Hotel, boarding house, residential college, hall of residence, hostel or any other residential purpose not described above. the bedroom corridors are categorised as protected corridor and all doors (except wet rooms) should be a minimum of FD30S. The doors should have a competent inspection every 6 months
  3. Mike North

    Mr

    The discounting of a final exit is all about the capacity of the building, how many people can I fit through the doors. This has nothing to do travel distances.
  4. Fire Safety Act 2021 Fire Safety Act 2021 factsheet: Information on commencement of sections 1 and 3 of the Fire Safety Act - GOV.UK Fire risk assessments A fire risk assessment is required by the Fire Safety Order to assess fire safety risks relevant to both workplaces and buildings with 2 or more sets of domestic premises. It is the duty of the responsible person to ensure that this is carried out, although they may appoint someone on their behalf, such as a competent fire risk assessor, to carry it out. So I think that you would need one
  5. Would ask for a copy of the latest fire risk assessment, as a tenant you have a right to request it.
  6. The door is not compliant with the current regulations, a Perko closer cannot be used on a fire door, it is incapable of overcoming the door latch. The doorbell cable does not appear to be fire stopped. It is doubtful that the handles are fitted correctly. The door does not look like a fire door, is it solid construction?
  7. Perhaps the most cost-effective solution might be to consider purchasing a new bed that can easily fit through the door.
  8. Not been a legal expert, I suspect that the building is currently compliant with the use as it is. You want to make a material change to your property by changing the use of the first and second floor to residential bringing BR into play, and now want your tenant to pay 57% of the cost? I wouldn’t have thought you couldn't make any claim on the tenant.
  9. The only way is to take photos of each step, ensure that there are some distinguishing marks on the frame in each photo. This can then be at any point in time to prove the frame was installed correctly
  10. To my knowledge, all fire doors are manufactured as none smoke doors, it is the inclusion of a smoke seal (fin or brush) in the intumescent that makes it in S. There is no difference in the allowable gaps (except the threshold)
  11. Building regs looks at each element and tells you what you need to do. Using BS9999 would allow you decrease some fire protection by increasing others. The RRO also allows this by risk assessing the changes. An example would be increasing the single travel distance by installing more fire detection in a building.
  12. I would suggest that the alarm for a semi is overkill, the maximum I would put in is an L3 with a CO detector wherever there is a gas appliance (unless there are vulnerable people) Thanks to the loft conversion all doors (except for wet rooms) that are connected to the stairwell will need to be FD30S. Unfortunately building regs do not allow for variation, once it is build you can then use the RRO to mix and match
  13. The regulations allow wall coverings as long as they are controlled and are at least B-s3, d2
  14. 1. This will be detailed in the fitting instuctions 2.This will be detailed in the fitting instuctions 3. You could always have the frame manulactured bespoke as long as the density of the wood os the same or better 4. Basicaly, no oil based 5. This will be detailed in the fitting instuctions
×
×
  • Create New...