Jump to content

Do flat owners under their own management need fire risk assessment?


Guest LauraGibs

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Unfortunately Building Control, private and public, have a habit of passing unsatisfactory premises, after all there is no real sanction against them (unlike for the duty holder and their competent person under the Fire Safety Order).

A piece of paper doesn't change the fact that physically the doors are wrong - it's how they are mitigated is the issue. Now technically they should have been FD30S doors and the aspiration should be to make them so. However the guidance (linked by Tom above) allows a sympathetic approach for existing situations and from the number of flats I'm guessing that they are only a couple of storeys high. The guidance in this case would allow notional fire doors, but this refers to 1960's/70's style fire doors that are of a suitable material and thickness but use 25mm stops instead of intumescent seals and smoke brushes - your doors sound like they are not even notional doors.

The next step up from this is 'upgraded' FD30S doors. This usually means adding appropriate seals and closers to notional FD30 doors, but in your case it would be more akin to the 'Acts' upgrades of non fire doors in the 60's and 70's where the door leaf itself needs uprating - this was usually done with Asbestolux or Superlux boards affixed to the risk side - in heritage premises a similar upgrade is done with intumescent paints and papers.

You need to cost both upgrade and replacement and weigh up the pros and cons. Upgrading may be cheaper (but not always by a lot depending on the amount of works required) but depending on the method used may not be aesthetic and is not going to offer the same assurance as a factory built third party accredited new door set. Replacement will be costly, but aesthetic (there are some very decorative looking fire doors these days) and guaranteed to perform (if correctly installed)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Further to what AB has said intumescent paints and papers are very susceptible to damage, especially in the domestic situation, consequently they would need checking more frequently than full FD30s doors, access to flats would not be easy and an addition cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Not necessarily, the legislation is not intended to be unduly burdensome and guidance is provided for responsible persons to conduct their own FRAs.

Having said that whoever does the FRA needs to be competent. In simple premises it could be the RP using the guides, where more complex the RP or an employee would need to have suitable training as well as the guides. Where the RP or their employees are not suitably competent then a suitable external contractor should be used, preferably one with third party certification such as BAFE SP205 or Warrington FIRAS.

Regardless of whoever does it you will need an FRA for the common parts of the block 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello

I'm sole freeholder of a 3 flat converted victorian. only common area is small hallway and stairs with landing. I'm I RP and do i have to obtain a fire safety certificate (I'm not sure there is a certain answer above), and are there companies that provide this at which cost? do you have some example or what i need to google for please? and lastly how often do i need to do this certificate please? many thanks, Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The common area is subject to The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 and requires a fire risk assessment. (FRA) You can do it yourself or use a fire risk assessor and choose one use A Guide to Choosing a Competent Fire Risk Assessor  or if you decide to do it yourself the following guidance will help. For prices you will have to contact the suitable fire risk assessor.

https://www.gov.uk/workplace-fire-safety-your-responsibilities

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fire-safety-risk-assessment-5-step-checklist

https://www.gov.uk/workplace-fire-safety-your-responsibilities/fire-risk-assessments

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any Fire Risk Assessment must be reviewed by the responsible person regularly so as to keep it up to date and particularly if -

(a) there is reason to suspect that it is no longer valid;
or
(b) there has been a significant change in the matters to which it relates including when the premises, special, technical and organisational measures, or organisation of the work undergo significant changes, extensions, or conversions,

 and where changes to an assessment are required as a result of any such review, the responsible person must make them.

Most FR assessors consider 12 months as being a reasonable time but not necessary.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi. I own a property which has 2 shops at grd floor and separate front door leading to communal staircase with 2 flats on the 1st and 2nd floor.  1st floor flats are being used as commercial offices. Do I need to link fire alarm system between the shop and flats. I'm concerned if there's a fire in the shop out of hours the residents won't know and egress could be hampered. There is a FA in the stairwell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the structural separation. You need to carry out a Fire Risk Assessment for a definitive answer, without carrying one out on site I can't give a definitive answer.

Has the change of use of the flats had the correct planning and building control permissions?

https://www.planningportal.co.uk/info/200130/common_projects/50/shops

This would have in part looked at the issue (but not for the whole premises and not in place of an FRA)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest Guest Sarah

Hello, I am selling my leasehold flat and the buyers solicitor has asked for a fire risk assessment and asbestos report for the communal areas.  The property is split into four flats and I own the basement flat with its own entrance. There is a communal front door and hall giving access to the upper three flats. There is a management company in place, which I think I have a share in.  Please can you tell me if I need to provide an assessment. As my flat has its own entrance I don't think I need it, is this correct?

Many thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In England and Wales the commons areas of blocks of flats are subject to The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 and require a fire risk assessment (FRA). The flats themselves are not subject to the RR(FS)O but The Housing Act 2004 which does not require a FRA.

As your flat does not have any commons areas what would you conduct the FRA on, it is most likely the management company are the Responsible Person, who are responsible for conducting the FRA anyway, you could ask them. Also in small premises if the RP employs less than five employees, there is no requirement to record the information, so what would you give them.

Do not know about the asbestos report, you will need to look elsewhere on that.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
Guest Tentpeg

Hi Tom,

I have recently taken over as the Chairman of a Residents Association for a block of flats built in 1991.  It has 22 flats over four floors, and the communal areas consist of the two stairwells and corridors, as well as areas for the lift access and foyers.  We also have an enclosed bins area, that everyone has acces to.  About 8 years ago a group of us bought the freehold and formed a company.  The Directors of the company are also members of the residents' association.   It has become apparent that we should have an FRA in place; my question is who pays for this?  The Freehold Company members each own shares of the lease, but the Resident's Association make the decisions on what work is conducted, running the accounts, booking the gardener and decides on decorating/work required, pays the buildings insurance, and allocates funds for the repairing of the lift etc.   

Can you advise on who would pick up the bill for the FRA?  Is it the responsibility of the Freehold Company or the Residents' Association in our case?

Thank you.

Tentpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You require a lawyers expertise so you need to contact your solicitor for expert advice.

What I can tell you is the common areas of your building is subject to The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005  and require a fire risk assessment (FRA). The flats themselves are not subject to the RR(FS)O but The Housing Act 2004 which does not require a FRA.

First you must identify the Responsible Person or RP,s, (article 3) and they have duties under article 5 which include an FRA.

The RP is the owner/freeholder or a company working on their behalf providing they have full control. It is the RP who has to carry out the findings of the FRA but nowhere does it say who has to pay for it and the RP could transfer the costs to any other involved persons depending on contract or tenant agreements.

Quite often it is included in the service charge but that would depend on tenants agreements and in your case I would think the Freehold Company would be the RP and they would pass on instructions to the residents association.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Guest Julie

Hi

I live in  block of 6 flats which are all own by leaseholder.  The communal area hand rail is used for drying clothes and leaving personal shoes outside.

Is this a fire risk if fire was to occur.  

Should the communal are not be kept clear at all time?  

Please advise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is possible to have managed use of the areas, but most flats follow the zero tolerance approach which is easier to police and so there should be nothing there. There are also possible H&S and liability issues too if stuff on a hand rail or shoes in the way causes a fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest Whatever_37

Hi, I live in a converted house. 4 separate flats. Ground, 1st and second floor (attic) there is an external fire escape which was built in the 1970's and is now falling apart.  Do we, a.) need  to replace or b.) can we just remove it?  It is not repairable.  It services the 1st and second floor flats.

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi Tom, I've been reading through most of the posts re-FRA. I live in a converted Georgian house with 5 flats. It is a Grade 2 listed building and we are all directors of the management company. We had an FRA about 2 months ago (paid £400 for it).... so far, none of the extensive fire safety work stated in the assessment has been scheduled despite myself and one other resident getting several quotes for the work. There seems to be a great deal of nonchalance and disinterest in the fire safety issues and so far we only have a list of priorities, the first of  which should happen in July. Part of the reason for the lack of movement on the work is, admittedly, that we have limited funds right now. However, some of the residents have stated that they don't see the necessity of the work stated in the FRA. My question is, is the FRA legally binding ie. are we committing an offence as a management company, by failing to act on the FRA, which gave a timescale of 4-6 weeks to complete the work? I feel as if I'm the only person in the building apart from one other resident (who is moving in July) taking the Fire Risk Assessment seriously! I would be most grateful for your advice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If done correctly the FRA should only identify the measures required to meet the Fire Safety Order and protect relevant persons from serious injury or death, any best practice issues in addition should clearly be identified as recommendations only.

If those measures are not undertaken (or alternatives providing equivalent protection) then there would remain a breach of the relevant parts of the Order which depending on severity and resultant risk would trigger enforcement action.

A decent FRA will grade deficiencies on severity/risk so certain works would be low risk with a long timescale as whilst technical breaches the resultant risk is low and on their own would not trigger enforcement.

Plenty of prosecutions out there where an FRA's actions were not complied with, the last person to cite in court that they thought they were 'only recommendations' still got convicted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest Salty Dog

Can someone please advise if new 10 yr sealed battery interlinked alarms are an acceptable alternative to mains ld3 for self contained flats.non HMO  in 4 storey converted house.  Tia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For self contained flats in a converted premises, the guidance used for your premises is HOUSING – FIRE SAFETY Guidance on fire safety provisions for certain types of existing housing which  recommends Grade A LD2 in the common areas and a grade D LD3 in the flats, check out the guidance.

The latest British Standard 5839-6: 2019 splits grade D in to two D1 and D2 but I would think either is acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...