Jump to content

AnthonyB

Power Member
  • Posts

    2,289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AnthonyB

  1. 12 hours ago, Guest Haz said:

    Hi there, I have a client that seems to believe that their FRA for a 14 storey mixed use (commercial, hospitality and residential) needs to be shared with all residents / leaseholders, is this correct?

    Yes, s156 of the Building Safety Act requires the risks & protective measures detailed in the FRA to be made available to residents and for other information to be provided to and FRAs aligned with other Responsible Persons.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/check-your-fire-safety-responsibilities-under-section-156-of-the-building-safety-act-2022/fire-safety-responsibilities-under-section-156-of-the-building-safety-act-2022

  2. 10 hours ago, Guest Tom said:

    Hi Anthony,

    Are thumb turns allowed on a final exit door?. The school has a couple of doors that has them. Should these be push pads?

    As said, depends on numbers and types of person that could be using them.

  3. 12 hours ago, Rays said:

    Hi Anthony B

    Private Quarters for the publican, so sleeping is a possibitity if they choose to do so..

    Seems a bit OTT if it's integral staff accommodation and operating a simultaneous evacuation policy with a suitable alarm system. 
    Such separation can't be retrospectively applied as it's not required in existing premises FRA guidance, nor would any sensible risk assessor require it in their FRA.

    Approved Document B is only for Building Regulations purposes so only kicks in for new builds or relevant 'building work' and would then bring in the 60 minute requirement as whilst it says "Compartmentation is not needed if one of the different purposes is ancillary to the other." it does say that if that ancillary use is a flat it must always be treated as a separate Purpose Group.

    ADB is not law, Building Regulations are and it is permitted to propose alternate solutions that would afford suitable safety such as BS9999 (which would allow 30 minutes where the floor of the upper storey is not over 5m)

    Sounds like you need to find a fire authority with experienced and enlightened staff & set up a Primary Authority arrangement with them!

  4. On 19/08/2023 at 09:44, richardinnorwich said:

    Hi everyone, I'm reading some conflicting information on how often Flat entrance Fire doors (not communal areas, lobby doors etc.) need to be inspected and the level of inspection/FRA required. The blocks that I'm asking for are all under 11m and meet all the criteria for the guidance that applies to "small blocks of flats". The articles/sites that I'm getting the info from are non-commercial and government sites, some seem to be saying that beyond an initial inspection, inside and out( gaps, seals, hinges, closer, intumescents etc) to establish that they comply with regs all that is required from that point is an external inspection to make sure it's still a good fit with no obvious signs of damage and that it hasn't been replaced. Other sites seem to be suggesting that they need and inside and out inspection with a check on gaps close etc. Within those differences the time periods for either inspection seems to vary, some saying annually, some every2 or 5 years, some suggesting that it's down to property owner to notify of any issues.

    Any guidance would be great, if you could supply a link/reference to the source material so I can reference it that would be even better.

    Thanks, Richard 

    The Guide linked to by Neil states:
    Six-monthly: • Check all fire doors, other than flat entrance doors, to ensure that they are undamaged and are effectively self-closing

    Annually: • Check all fire doors in the common areas to ensure that they remain in good condition and fit well in their frames • Ensure that self-closing devices fitted to flat entrance doors and doors in common areas remain in working order and close the doors effectively in their frames

    The guide has s50 status which means in respect of compliance with fire safety legislation:

    "1A) Where in any proceedings it is alleged that a person has contravened a provision of articles 8 to 22 or of regulations made under article 24 in relation to a relevant building (or part of the building)—

    (a)proof of a failure to comply with any applicable risk based guidance may be relied on as tending to establish that there was such a contravention, and

    (b)proof of compliance with any applicable risk based guidance may be relied on as tending to establish that there was no such contravention."

    Which essentially means that it would be wise to follow the regime in the guide!

  5. On 16/08/2023 at 10:50, Guest GmK said:

    Morning,

    Could anyone explain what i would need to have done to conform, I have a building with 1 key switch in the reception for the Em fitting Test the rest of the Em fittings  in the Building are a self maintained type.

     

    Technically one central test switch meets the relevant standard (BS5266-1) as all it says is:
    "8.3.3 Test facility
    Each emergency lighting system should have an appropriate means for simulating failure of the normal supply for test purposes (e.g. manual isolatingbdevice or automatic testing).
    The test facility should be able to be used for both monthly short tests and annual full duration tests. The test facility should be protected from unauthorized operation.
    The test device should not interrupt power to any other electrical equipment that could cause a hazard."

    However for convenience and to avoid the monthly function test duration going on too long (with consequential longer recharge times and greater risk of battery damage) it's common in better installations to have multiple test points, sometimes one for each floor, sometimes one for each room & section of corridor!

  6. No, it's been a key principle in guidance since 2011 that the self closers are fitted. Many deaths at Grenfell were attributed to missing or non working self closers allowing the internal escape stair (not directly affected by the cladding) to become impassable as it quickly filled with smoke from all the open doors.

    The guidance  when it comes to residential is increasingly more than just a suggestion as it now has special legal status:
     

    (1A) Where in any proceedings it is alleged that a person has contravened a provision of articles 8 to 22 or of regulations made under article 24 in relation to a relevant building (or part of the building)—

    (a)proof of a failure to comply with any applicable risk based guidance may be relied on as tending to establish that there was such a contravention, and

    (b)proof of compliance with any applicable risk based guidance may be relied on as tending to establish that there was no such contravention.

     

    If you don't follow the guide you have proven your guilt!

     

    The guidance is quite generous in smaller blocks allowing older fire doors to be retained but will not move on self closers - too many deaths associated with open doors (even before Grenfell)

    There are lots of options to make a self closer less burdensome - delayed action closers, swing free closers, etc

  7. It's not the total number in the building that dictates fastenings and direction of opening but the number realistically likely to need to use them. Unless things get really bad in education it's unlikely a classroom direct exit will be used by more than 60 persons and evacuation will be staff led so an EN179 push pad exit device would be accepted.

  8. It require a commercial system does unless it is so small that a fire would be readily discovered and the alarm spread throughout by shouts. Building Regulations and every bit of fire legislation guidance from the 60's to the current day requires a layered approach to fire warning where the minimum system to comply with legislation (if not very small) is a Category M BS5839-1 system of manual call points & sounders. Only if required would you then add detection.

  9. LACORS only applies where a conversion isn't to post 1991 Building Regulations. A 1996 conversion & AOV suggests to ADB and stay put, however there are lots of other factors you mention which are not! 

    The fire strategy from the conversion would help (unless lost) as it would explain the rationale. Smoke control is also to benefit the fire service as well as escape and it's likely it was introduced as such under Building Regs so you can't negate it as there is an absolute duty to maintain it.

    Not straightforward and certainly not possible to be definitive on here.

  10. On 09/08/2023 at 23:07, Guest Danny said:

    20230809_084605.thumb.jpg.0d8e770e3b4d1cc1f62caf6f83571180.jpg20230809_084605.thumb.jpg.0d8e770e3b4d1cc1f62caf6f83571180.jpgHi was reading this page and just wanted to know do u really have a museum as I might have something u would like

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    20230809_084619.jpg

    20230809_084605.jpg

    Hi,

     

    Yes I do - I can see a Chubb PSK 5 5 kilo ABC Powder extinguisher from the 70's next to it as well! Equally collectible.
     

    Here's about 10% of the total collection I have:

    No photo description available.

    No photo description available.

    No photo description available.

  11. Because it dated back to old battery technology (such as when wet lead acid central battery systems were common) and gives no benefit. Current battery types are actually damaged by part duration testing and it was found that by hour testing cells soon developed a memory effect and would prematurely fail 3 hour tests - a nice earner for test and install company's but a unnecessary large cost to end users

×
×
  • Create New...